NGOs, IGOs, and other international organizations in Afghanistan or Research Paper

NGOs, IGOs, and other international organizations in Afghanistan or Africa for Humanitarian efforts - Research Paper ExampleIn many crises where the US military machine gets involved, USAID offers a parley nexus between military and humanitarian agencies.2 However, in Afghanistan security concerns hindered AID initi on the wholey because the communication link was not forthcoming since NGO hightail iters complained that soldiers encroached in their domain by engaging in humanitarian work instead of offering security. In Afghanistan, the US army placed Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) of roughly cytosine military combat personnel and extra civil affairs personnel in districts across the nation. These teams created military presence in remote beas thus offering limited security while aiding to respond to the needs of the race in the country, while the US forces withdrew from urban areas. Despite the shift, three years later force play in the country noticeably increase resulting in increased attacks targeting the civilians. The afghan Taliban forces increased their attacks against NATO, the countrys troops and increasingly engaged in suicide bombings targeting the military and civilians. 3 Despite the different perspectives, interdependency between international organizations, NGOs, donor organizations and the military is apparent and is a result of overlapping tasks and inadequate resources available in mission areas. Therefore, military and civil operations influence one another in all levels thus the risk of counteracting one another. Nevertheless, thrivingly integrated civilian and military efforts in complex emergencies are crucial to flourishing relief efforts and reconstruction although, there is a risk of humanitarian organizations being associated with potentially unwelcome military force thus losing their protective gloss of neutrality. Many humanitarian organizations focus on delivering humanitarian help in on going conflict thus inte gration is deeply offensive therefore, they easily interact with military forces. In disrupted societies equivalent Afghanistan, with huge dysfunctional authorities and constant hostilities make the conditions for fruitful civil-military cooperation poor.4 Despite problems caused by military involvement in assisting civilians, other coordination efforts like UN agencies and NGOs were successful in working together. The World Food Program reportedly delivered enormous amount of food in 2001 and credited its staff, donors and NGO implementing partners. However, the governmental future of Afghanistan may be in limbo, the humanitarian outcome of American-led warfare and subsequent relief effort could be termed as a success with regard to the number of people served, quality of service and health of the population. Moreover, access to people in need increased because of the fresh political conditions after the defeat of the Taliban. As well, the amount and diversity of services offer ed in many regions of the nation increased like health and nutritional status for many people improved and many Afghans returned to their homes. The success was collect to the humanitarian infrastructure established prior to 2001 and other things happening at the administrative level like provision of copious resources, specialization in organizations and the high level of connectivity. 5 Nevertheless, there were differences evident in operational levels where humanitarian and military organizations overlapped or did not communicate, which could have